And this old post must be read, too. It was written on the 18th of January, 2012, five days before hundreds of thousands Hungarians took to the streets of Budapest in freezing cold in defense of the Orbán-government.
PM Orbán later said several times this huge rally prevented EU/IMF from doing to what Hungary what they did in Italy and Greece, that is replacing their democratically elected prime ministers with their stooges.


The pro-Orbán rally on the 23rd of January, 2012

The Slog.

Orban…bad guy who may do some good?

While the media in general are paying far more attention to Greece and its determination to play by the rules and thus win back market respect, Hungarian maverick Viktor Orban takes the opposite view. He may well represent a far bigger threat to the shibboleths of our current form of capitalism.

It’s hard to be anything other than equivocal about the rumbling Hungarian crisis. On the one hand, Magyar Prime Minister Victor Orban appears to be in the same Bonkers League as Recep Erdogan, displaying as he does the familiar mix of controlling political power-grabs, while pursuing economic policies best described as All over the Place. But on the other hand, Orban was elected with an overwhelming majority, he inherited most of the fiscal problems from the previous deficit-obsessed New Labour-style government (Peter Mandelson had quite a few ‘friends’ in it), and…

View original post 1,445 more words


Crippled free press

So-called “left liberals” are petitioning   in order that the EU countries should apply the most severe sanction (Article VII of the EU Treaty) against Hungary because

Hungary is no longer a democracy. … the situation for women, ethnic minorities and religious groups in Hungary becomes deadlier by the second … along with criminalization of the homeless and attacks on women and the LGBT community, Hungary’s seen a horrific spike in state-sanctioned antisemitism and racism…

Then these  hysterolib, shall I say libnazi, liars  use this picture, showing a huge crowd demonstrating in Kossuth square in front of the Parliament,  to illustrate their petition … which drools about the government’s “crippling the free press:

A huge crowd in the streets of Budapest

At a closer look one can see that the sign in the front says “Nem leszünk gyarmat!” (We won’t be a colony!)… Oh, yes, I took part on that rally with this slogan…  It was freezing cold on  the 22nd of January, 2012 and I marched together with several hundreds of thousands Hungarians… and we were protesting exactly against those who sign this petition, protesting against the hysterical, vile attacks directed at Hungary then and in support of democratically elected Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.  This huge crowd gathered so that EU/IMF wouldn’t do to my country what they did  earlier in Italy and Greece when they simply replaced their democratically elected governments with the delegated EU/IMF lackeys.

This petition is a perfect example for that what kind of methods these so-called proponents of free press use.

As opposed to this huge crowd of people supporting the Orbán government, the “champions of free press” could gather only a magnitude smaller crowd on the 2nd of January, 2010 at the height of a very well mediatized international hysteria campaign against Fidesz and PM Orbán. That must be the explanation why these “democrats” (that’s how they always call themselves) try to make their point with a picture of the  much  bigger pro-government rally.

It goes without saying that the “free press”, such as the Washington Post, the BBC, Süddeutsche Zeitung, etc., all tried very hard to increase the importance of the anti-government rally and to make orts of the pro-government one.

Related articles

Hungary and the Euro

There was general consensus among all the parties and economic analysts in 2002, when the first Orbán government was still in power, that Hungary could and should introduce Euro as her currency in 2007.  Then  MSZP-SZDSZ came and their catastrophic economic policies utterly destroyed the chance for this.  They increased the public debt of Hungary from 54% of the GDP in 2002 to around 80% in 2008 and Hungary  “de facto” defaulted when the global economic crisis hit. This manifested itself  in the  IMF giga-loan in 2008 .  The leftliberals and IMF carefully timed the repayment of this 25 billion euro loan between 2010 and 2014,  as a kind of booby-trap, knowing well Fidesz would win the next elections. (Such SBA agreements usually have a seven year repayment period.)

What was seen to be a bad thing at that time  seems to turn out to be more and more of an economic advantage for Hungary now. The Euro has had quite a few victims so far in Europe, these are commonly mentioned as the PIIGS countries (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain) and  Slovenia is going to be the next one:   “Euro-area dynamics did the rest. As banks have to be saved by individual member states, Slovenia found itself in a catch-22. It needed to raise more money but due to soaring costs of debt refinancing, the country found its access to international financial markets barred at a time it was most needed.”  PIIGSS!

Let’s note that Prime Minister Orbán, who is very likely to be re-elected in 2014,  has ruled out Hungary’s joining the Euro zone any time soon:  “When we think of joining the eurozone, we do not speak of next year, but about the next decade or two decades or three decades. If the euro still exists by then”  He also added that if Hungary had been a member of the euro zone in the past three years then it would have been unable to take unorthodox economic measures. And those economic measures now do seem to work. (See also my earlier posts on  the Hungarian economy.)

An American commenter (“Southerner”) pointed out in a comment to this post:    “from my Western perspective the EU currency creation was the beginning of conflict the likes of which are no different in the intended outcome and objective than in WWI & WWII. That is; Germany in control but not responsible for the economies in the EU. And from that perch, will ally with other historic partners to dominate larger and larger regions. None of this is evil, just good business.”

So let’s see what introducing Euro means for a peripheral European economy (such as Hungary, the PIIGS countries or Slovenia):  you lose the freedom to control two important  macroeconomic variables at the same time:  the monetary base and the base rates set by the national bank of the peripheral economy.  Apart from controlling inflation, the major task of a central bank is providing fiscal stimulation in times of recession and providing fiscal control in times of economic booms.  What do the peripheral economies get in return for losing their ability to influence their own business cycles?  Strong coupling  to the business cycles of the central economy (Germany), which may not mean  synchronization!, and a significant loss of economic freedom.  In fact German Chancellor Angela Merkel herself admitted  openly that  the European Central Bank “should  really increase the base rate now if they considered only Germany’s interests”, that is she observed the conflicting interests of the core economies and the peripheral economies. Removing the economic options of devaluing one’s currency in order to boost exports and inhibit imports or inflating debt away is really a huge blow for the latter ones.   It will inevitably result in the peripheral economies being endebted to the core economies  as we could already witness this.
A common currency for countries with vastly different economies, where there don’t exist such cohesion forces such as a common language and common culture, is a surefire recipe for increasing political tensions both domestically and internationally. People will say  “Why should we pay for those lazy bastards out there?” in the core economies and they will say “Those rich bastards are colonializing us!” in the peripheral economies.  This will show eventually on the international scene as well:  Germany may not be able to oversee always that there should be a docile political leadership in Greece.   There are some cracks visible even already on the German-French “tandem”!

In the long run and from a global perspective, there could be two outcomes: either the political considerations will prove to be stronger than the economic ones and this will eventually drag down Germany, too. (Assuming Germany would have the political will and means to force their ways, of course. One must still  keep in mind that Germany doesn’t have the military projection power at all the US has which still keeps the US dollar afloat despite their exponentially growing debt and their huge trade balance deficit.) This will result in a less and less significant Europe in global politics.  If Hungary manages to ride the waves then this will mean a relatively stronger Hungary though.

Obviously the other outcome is the break-up of Euro.  This would mean a turmoil all over Europe which would severely affect Hungary, too, and I don’t  know what the long term outcome for Hungary would be.  Perhaps, in relative terms, Hungary could be still better off.  This break-up could have two forms: either Germany would adopt a dual-currency system or the endebted peripheral economies would.  (A variation on this is less fragmentation, i.e. splitting the Euro into two classes: prime and subprime Euro.) The global implications are less clear but one thing is sure: the disappearance of the Euro would significantly delay the inevitable collapse of the US dollar.

Then, of course, going alone is riskier than tying your boat to a big ship. There is the very real possibility that Hungary would not succeed with these “unorthodox economic measures” and keeping her national currency (Hungarian Forint) would lead eventually to an economic-political crash. This could happen in either cases outlined above as well.  There are hungry sharks and sharp cliffs out there…  I’ll leave exploring the chances of this and the pro-arguments  for the interested reader who disagrees with me about that the Euro  would be harmful for Hungary in  the long run.

%d bloggers like this: